Markov Chain Analysis of Problematic Financing in Sharia Banks

https://doi.org/10.47194/ijgor.v5i2.292

Authors

  • Rini Cahyandari Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Weni Rahmawati Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
  • Aep Saepuloh Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

Keywords:

Markov chains, problem financing, steady state opportunities, sharia banking.

Abstract

Indonesia is the country with the largest Muslim population in the world, which makes people start to switch to sharia banking services because they do not use the usury system. This can be seen from the role of the community in using sharia banking services, including in distributing funds. From financing activities, the more funds distributed, the greater the potential for risk to arise. If there are customers who do not comply with installment payments, this will create a problem in financing in sharia banking, which is called problematic financing. The classification and criteria for problematic financing are divided into three, namely substandard, doubtful and nonperforming. To overcome this risk, preventive measures are taken, one of which is by knowing the possibility of financing problems in the future, which can be calculated using Markov chain analysis. This research uses secondary data on substandard, doubtful and non-performing problematic financing in the period 2016 to 2021 at several sharia banks in Indonesia. The opportunity value is searched until it meets the balance condition (steady state). Based on the research results, it was found that Sharia Commercial Banks (BUS) will experience a state of balance at step 5, Sharia Business Units (UUS) will experience a state of balance at step 11, Sharia Rural Banks (BPRS) will experience a state of balance at step 6.

References

Abdillah, MF (2023). Buying and Selling Gold from a Non-Cash Sharia Perspective (Analytical Study of National Sharia Council Fatwa Number 77 of 2010). Al-Arfa: Journal of Sharia, Economics and Islamic Law, 1(1), 1-11.

Ayu Rizaty, M. (2022), “Jumlah Penduduk Muslim Indonesia Terbesar di Dunia pada 2022â€, indonesia data. Avaliable: https://dataindonesia.id/ragam/detail/populasi-muslim-indonesia-terbesar-di-dunia-pda-2022. Accessed: 27 November 2022.

Hermanns, H., & Hermanns, H. (2002). Markov Chain. Interactive Markov Chains: And the Search for Quantified Quality, 35-55.

Kasmir. (2008) “Dasar-Dasar Perbankanâ€, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008.

Lubis, ME, & Soemitra, A. (2022). The Impact of Dual Banking Systems on the Financial Performance of Sharia Banks in Indonesia: Literature Review and Perspectives of Sharia Economics Postgraduate Students. International Journal of Cultural and Social Sciences, 3(2), 168-176.

Nugraha, E., & Setiawan, A. (2018). Problematic financing factors in general sharia banking in Indonesia. International Journal of Trade and Finance, 4(1), 27-39.

Rahmawati, F., Ulama'i, A.H.A.A., & Din, M.U. (2022). Usury in the Perspective of Sharia Bank Customers: A Systematic Literature Review. Velocity: Journal of Islamic Finance and Banking, 2(1), 73-90.

Supriyatni, R., & Nurjamil, N. (2021). The Urgency of Handling Non-Performing Financing in Sharia Banks in the Development of the Indonesian Sharia Economy. PADJADJARAN Journal of Legal Studies (Law Journal), 8(1), 26-46.

Susanty, A., Akshinta, P.Y., Ulkhaq, M.M., & Puspitasari, N.B. (2022). Analysis of transition tendencies between environmentally friendly consumer behavior segments using the Markov chain approach. Journal of Management Modeling, 17(4), 1177-1212.

Wahyudi, I., & Sakti, A. (2016). Analyzing production sharing contracts with Markov models. Communication in Science and Technology, 1(2).

Zahra, SF, Ascarya, A., & Huda, N. (2018). Measuring the stability of the dual banking system in Indonesia: A Markov switching approach. Al-Iqtishad: Journal of Sharia Economics, 10(1), 25-52.

Published

2024-05-27